The Industrial Revolution had an effect on the imagination of society, it made people think that their culture was to be judged solely by its commercial success in a struggle of which the whole world was now the arena. The test of success was the test of profits :if a society could make its social and political conditions favorable to the earning of high profits that society was prosperous.1
As a theme the Industrial revolution has been subject to bulks of critical papers resulting to an abundance of literature, scholar exploration and surveys researching its effects on the social and economic structure of society; the quality of life; laboring and the emerging of new social classes. Nonetheless one distinct feature, considerably investigated, but rather unknown, would be the chapter of the Luddites. The legendary counterrevolution movement of the skilled English artisans, who spiritedly and actively opposed to the evolutionary one-way of the industrial revolution and to the effects that it would have on their livelihood.
It has been argued among social historians that: 'The Luddites were desperate bands of weavers who hated machines' or that the Luddites were involved in a emotional 'pointless frenzied industrial Jaquering.' Opposition to these views supports that the Luddites were well aware of their social status; as well as their potential power and that they organized in a early form of 'conscious class struggle' using 'collective bargain by riot' as a means of pressure, when all other measures had failed.
Nedd Ludd